Researchers have used availability models to explain the correspondence between evaluative judgments and recall of evidence (Hastie & Park, 1986; Hastie & Pennington, 1989). These models imply that items recalled affect one's judgment. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the causal relationship might be in the opposite direction in some cases, so that the judgment affects which items are recalled. In two experiments, subjects' judgments were manipulated and recall of evidence items was tested. As hypothesized, subjects recalled more items supporting their judgments than opposing them. It is proposed that subjects' judgments can act as retrieval cues to guide recall of evidence items.